One in the arguments I see yearly is that one particular game is ‘sim’ whilst the opposite is ‘arcade’. Yet again, there’s no real consensus for this with just numerous people arguing true one way because other. For us, I think they have got different approaches to football and yes it depends where your current focus is to what your opinion are going to be.
FIFA has your realistic ball activity and physics (however sometimes exaggerated it seems like, with shots pinging the woodwork too often) and can provde the scrappy goal jaws incidents and excitement in the Premier League, whereas PES gives you more of a new considered Serie A type affair where avid gamers have time and space to come up with their unique expertise.
If it’s your tactical side in the game you’re immediately after, PES has the more effective player movement along with overall intelligence to make beautiful set bits. If it’s your core fundamentals involving kicking a basketball around (because of the realistic difficulties which could entail and well because pleasures) and then perhaps FIFA 16 Points carries a slight edge. I think these kind of conflicting arguments often are derived from how the games look in motion and also how they participate in.
|
